Workflow Intel

Triage queue

Workflows

prompting

Note on 24th September 2026

Simon Willison's Weblog (LLM / AI engineering) · Sep 24, 2026

ADOPT-CHEAPModel: ARCHIVE
ev0cred2dur2com0cmp1app2

Claim: Coding agents make software engineering harder and require extraordinary discipline and knowledge to unlock their potential.

Evidence: Personal observation from time spent working with coding agents; no quantified data, reproducible tests, or comparative metrics provided.

Rationale

Bare assertion from experience, no reproducible data or method. Relevant to Timothy's CC+Codex workflow (applicability=2) but too vague to act on. Hype markers present (superlative "extraordinary", unquantified "full potential"). No commoditization angle. Archive as context for discipline discussion, not actionable triage item.

WAITModel: ARCHIVE
ev1cred2dur1com0cmp0app2

Claim: NVIDIA engineers and researchers use Codex with GPT-5.5 to ship production systems and turn research ideas into runnable experiments

Evidence: Assertion of internal NVIDIA practice; no quantified results, before/after metrics, or reproducible signal provided

Rationale

Baseline tier 3, downgraded to 2: bare assertion of practice with zero quantified evidence. Unverified internal claim from NVIDIA (plausible but unsubstantiated). No metrics, no reproducible signal, no methodology—just a statement that teams do this. GPT-5.5 reference (unfamiliar model name) is plausible per guidance, so credibility is lowered only for lack of evidence, not novelty of model name.